ref: fc7f042ad6ee4b5af83cf7908e5621a184864ea0
parent: 3036b5859894be1bc4523d7e309fca5015728679
parent: b421c983d6cd577905b0bafe2c5c200f681552ef
author: Eldred Habert <eldredhabert0@gmail.com>
date: Sun Oct 4 15:43:38 EDT 2020
Merge pull request #551 from NieDzejkob/errors-after-unknown-symbol link: Suppress cascading errors.
--- a/src/link/patch.c
+++ b/src/link/patch.c
@@ -62,9 +62,17 @@
return (uint32_t)value << shiftamt;
}
-/* This is an "empty"-type stack */
+/*
+ * This is an "empty"-type stack. Apart from the actual values, we also remember
+ * whether the value is a placeholder inserted for error recovery. This allows
+ * us to avoid cascading errors.
+ *
+ * The best way to think about this is a stack of (value, errorFlag) pairs.
+ * They are only separated for reasons of memory efficiency.
+ */
struct RPNStack {
- int32_t *buf;
+ int32_t *values;
+ bool *errorFlags;
size_t size;
size_t capacity;
} stack;
@@ -72,8 +80,9 @@
static inline void initRPNStack(void)
{
stack.capacity = 64;
- stack.buf = malloc(sizeof(*stack.buf) * stack.capacity);
- if (!stack.buf)
+ stack.values = malloc(sizeof(*stack.values) * stack.capacity);
+ stack.errorFlags = malloc(sizeof(*stack.errorFlags) * stack.capacity);
+ if (!stack.values || !stack.errorFlags)
err(1, "Failed to init RPN stack");
}
@@ -82,7 +91,7 @@
stack.size = 0;
}
-static void pushRPN(int32_t value)
+static void pushRPN(int32_t value, bool comesFromError)
{
if (stack.size >= stack.capacity) {
static const size_t increase_factor = 2;
@@ -91,21 +100,28 @@
errx(1, "Overflow in RPN stack resize");
stack.capacity *= increase_factor;
- stack.buf =
- realloc(stack.buf, sizeof(*stack.buf) * stack.capacity);
+ stack.values =
+ realloc(stack.values, sizeof(*stack.values) * stack.capacity);
+ stack.errorFlags =
+ realloc(stack.errorFlags, sizeof(*stack.errorFlags) * stack.capacity);
/*
* Static analysis tools complain that the capacity might become
* zero due to overflow, but fail to realize that it's caught by
* the overflow check above. Hence the stringent check below.
*/
- if (!stack.buf || !stack.capacity)
+ if (!stack.values || !stack.errorFlags || !stack.capacity)
err(1, "Failed to resize RPN stack");
}
- stack.buf[stack.size] = value;
+ stack.values[stack.size] = value;
+ stack.errorFlags[stack.size] = comesFromError;
stack.size++;
}
+// This flag tracks whether the RPN op that is currently being evaluated
+// has popped any values with the error flag set.
+static bool isError = false;
+
static int32_t popRPN(struct FileStackNode const *node, uint32_t lineNo)
{
if (stack.size == 0)
@@ -112,12 +128,14 @@
fatal(node, lineNo, "Internal error, RPN stack empty");
stack.size--;
- return stack.buf[stack.size];
+ isError |= stack.errorFlags[stack.size];
+ return stack.values[stack.size];
}
static inline void freeRPNStack(void)
{
- free(stack.buf);
+ free(stack.values);
+ free(stack.errorFlags);
}
/* RPN operators */
@@ -149,6 +167,8 @@
* @param patch The patch to compute the value of
* @param section The section the patch is contained in
* @return The patch's value
+ * @return isError Set if an error occurred during evaluation, and further
+ * errors caused by the value should be suppressed.
*/
static int32_t computeRPNExpr(struct Patch const *patch,
struct Symbol const * const *fileSymbols)
@@ -166,6 +186,8 @@
patch->src, patch->lineNo);
int32_t value;
+ isError = false;
+
/*
* Friendly reminder:
* Be VERY careful with two `popRPN` in the same expression.
@@ -191,7 +213,9 @@
case RPN_DIV:
value = popRPN();
if (value == 0) {
- error(patch->src, patch->lineNo, "Division by 0");
+ if (!isError)
+ error(patch->src, patch->lineNo, "Division by 0");
+ isError = true;
popRPN();
value = INT32_MAX;
} else {
@@ -201,7 +225,9 @@
case RPN_MOD:
value = popRPN();
if (value == 0) {
- error(patch->src, patch->lineNo, "Modulo by 0");
+ if (!isError)
+ error(patch->src, patch->lineNo, "Modulo by 0");
+ isError = true;
popRPN();
value = 0;
} else {
@@ -280,11 +306,13 @@
error(patch->src, patch->lineNo,
"Requested BANK() of symbol \"%s\", which was not found",
fileSymbols[value]->name);
+ isError = true;
value = 1;
} else if (!symbol->section) {
error(patch->src, patch->lineNo,
"Requested BANK() of non-label symbol \"%s\"",
fileSymbols[value]->name);
+ isError = true;
value = 1;
} else {
value = symbol->section->bank;
@@ -302,6 +330,7 @@
error(patch->src, patch->lineNo,
"Requested BANK() of section \"%s\", which was not found",
name);
+ isError = true;
value = 1;
} else {
value = sect->bank;
@@ -312,6 +341,7 @@
if (!patch->pcSection) {
error(patch->src, patch->lineNo,
"PC has no bank outside a section");
+ isError = true;
value = 1;
} else {
value = patch->pcSection->bank;
@@ -320,11 +350,13 @@
case RPN_HRAM:
value = popRPN();
- if (value < 0
- || (value > 0xFF && value < 0xFF00)
- || value > 0xFFFF)
+ if (!isError && (value < 0
+ || (value > 0xFF && value < 0xFF00)
+ || value > 0xFFFF)) {
error(patch->src, patch->lineNo,
"Value %" PRId32 " is not in HRAM range", value);
+ isError = true;
+ }
value &= 0xFF;
break;
@@ -333,9 +365,12 @@
/* Acceptable values are 0x00, 0x08, 0x10, ..., 0x38
* They can be easily checked with a bitmask
*/
- if (value & ~0x38)
- error(patch->src, patch->lineNo,
- "Value %" PRId32 " is not a RST vector", value);
+ if (value & ~0x38) {
+ if (!isError)
+ error(patch->src, patch->lineNo,
+ "Value %" PRId32 " is not a RST vector", value);
+ isError = true;
+ }
value |= 0xC7;
break;
@@ -357,6 +392,7 @@
error(patch->src, patch->lineNo,
"PC has no value outside a section");
value = 0;
+ isError = true;
} else {
value = patch->pcOffset + patch->pcSection->org;
}
@@ -366,6 +402,7 @@
if (!symbol) {
error(patch->src, patch->lineNo,
"Unknown symbol \"%s\"", fileSymbols[value]->name);
+ isError = true;
} else {
value = symbol->value;
/* Symbols attached to sections have offsets */
@@ -376,7 +413,7 @@
break;
}
- pushRPN(value);
+ pushRPN(value, isError);
}
if (stack.size > 1)
@@ -383,6 +420,7 @@
error(patch->src, patch->lineNo,
"RPN stack has %zu entries on exit, not 1", stack.size);
+ isError = false;
return popRPN();
#undef popRPN
@@ -394,10 +432,12 @@
initRPNStack();
while (assert) {
- if (!computeRPNExpr(&assert->patch,
- (struct Symbol const * const *)
- assert->fileSymbols)) {
- switch ((enum AssertionType)assert->patch.type) {
+ int32_t value = computeRPNExpr(&assert->patch,
+ (struct Symbol const * const *)assert->fileSymbols);
+ enum AssertionType type = assert->patch.type;
+
+ if (!isError && !value) {
+ switch (type) {
case ASSERT_FATAL:
fatal(assert->patch.src, assert->patch.lineNo, "%s",
assert->message[0] ? assert->message
@@ -415,6 +455,11 @@
: "assert failure");
break;
}
+ } else if (isError && type == ASSERT_FATAL) {
+ fatal(assert->patch.src, assert->patch.lineNo,
+ "couldn't evaluate assertion%s%s",
+ assert->message[0] ? ": " : "",
+ assert->message);
}
struct Assertion *next = assert->next;
@@ -450,7 +495,7 @@
+ patch->pcOffset + 1;
int16_t jumpOffset = value - address;
- if (jumpOffset < -128 || jumpOffset > 127)
+ if (!isError && (jumpOffset < -128 || jumpOffset > 127))
error(patch->src, patch->lineNo,
"jr target out of reach (expected -129 < %" PRId16 " < 128)",
jumpOffset);
@@ -467,8 +512,8 @@
[PATCHTYPE_LONG] = {4, INT32_MIN, INT32_MAX}
};
- if (value < types[patch->type].min
- || value > types[patch->type].max)
+ if (!isError && (value < types[patch->type].min
+ || value > types[patch->type].max))
error(patch->src, patch->lineNo,
"Value %#" PRIx32 "%s is not %u-bit",
value, value < 0 ? " (maybe negative?)" : "",
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/link/cascading-errors-fatal-assert.asm
@@ -1,0 +1,2 @@
+ assert FATAL, UnknownSymbol == 42
+ assert WeDontReachHere
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/link/cascading-errors-fatal-assert.out
@@ -1,0 +1,3 @@
+error: cascading-errors-fatal-assert.asm(1): Unknown symbol "UnknownSymbol"
+fatal: cascading-errors-fatal-assert.asm(1): couldn't evaluate assertion
+Linking aborted after 2 errors
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/link/cascading-errors.asm
@@ -1,0 +1,19 @@
+SECTION "zero", ROM0[$0]
+Zero:
+
+; Pin the section such that a jr to 0 is out of range
+SECTION "test", ROM0[$1000]
+ ;; XXX: the fallback value used is the index of the symbol (in the object file?)
+ ;; Is this intended?
+ dw Bar
+ dw Foo / Bar
+ dw Foo / Zero
+
+ rst Foo
+
+ jr NonExist
+
+ ldh a, [hNonExist + $200]
+
+ assert Foo == 42
+ assert WARN, Bar == 42
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/link/cascading-errors.out
@@ -1,0 +1,11 @@
+error: cascading-errors.asm(18): Unknown symbol "Foo"
+error: cascading-errors.asm(19): Unknown symbol "Bar"
+error: cascading-errors.asm(16): Unknown symbol "hNonExist"
+error: cascading-errors.asm(14): Unknown symbol "NonExist"
+error: cascading-errors.asm(12): Unknown symbol "Foo"
+error: cascading-errors.asm(10): Unknown symbol "Foo"
+error: cascading-errors.asm(10): Division by 0
+error: cascading-errors.asm(9): Unknown symbol "Foo"
+error: cascading-errors.asm(9): Unknown symbol "Bar"
+error: cascading-errors.asm(8): Unknown symbol "Bar"
+Linking failed with 10 errors