shithub: riscv

--- a/lib/rob

+++ b/lib/rob

@@ -334,3 +334,21 @@

 We do not accept patches

 Syntax highlighting is juvenile.

 Working as designed.

+I've written programs with twenty implementations of io.Reader inside.

+Who cares? Shut up.

+What is wrong with my analysis?

+I just want to explain something.

+I recommend in the strongest terms that you don't do this.

+Sockets are the X windows of IO interfaces.

+Ignore what I wrote.

+In other words, here's how to do it but don't do it.

+I did indeed.

+I don't understand what you mean by 'reset'.

+I am, and as far as I can tell it makes no difference whatsoever.

+Please put this silly objection to rest. It has no merit.

+Interpretations will vary.

+I think the pattern used well is perfectly acceptable in certain situations.

+Like everything that attracts scrutiny, the key point is to use the idea well: safely, clearly, correctly, and only when appropriate.

+I am not trying to be difficult, but you must understand it's not simple to address your question.

+One step at a time.

+Thanks for grinding through those.

--- a/lib/rsc

+++ b/lib/rsc

@@ -205,3 +205,17 @@

 It's true that there are no plans yet, but I think it's also true that we need to start planning.

 Yes, that's confusing.

 Please do not spend time on this.

+Maybe this is true, but I haven't seen it.

+The fundamental design question here is whether the benefit outweighs the complexity being added.

+Enough with the religion. Please.

+It should just work.

+Sorry for not replying earlier. I don't really know.

+Great.

+This seems OK.

+Let's take our time and do it right (whatever that is).

+Really we're just behind on triaging bugs.

+I'll dig the code up and post it somewhere. I never made it truly usable.

+Will follow up off list.

+Wait a second.

+I think it's always been this way.

+I would wait until there's a more established pattern of a problem before introducing additional mechanisms.

--- a/lib/theo

+++ b/lib/theo

@@ -522,3 +522,48 @@

 Everyone, please ignore these trolls who are cross-posting.

 Essentially, you are on your own. :-)

 I am not so sure.

+obviously.

+I don't know, but I'll think about it later, because I am busy.

+So the original idea wasn't yours.  And now you think it can't work.  And you are still talking about it.  I see.  Very interesting.

+That statement is full of potential for misunderstanding, and cannot be left alone.

+I was wrong.

+Thanks.

+Careful there :-)

+That is incorrect advice for the OpenBSD world.

+Your mistake.

+This bug report totally sucks.

+what is "this case"?

+my advice: walk away from this one.

+Generally Unix has no way of doing this.

+So what do you really mean here?

+Is a crash a performance impact?

+what is the goal?

+Your emails only contain opinions.

+words words words words

+Are you done?

+Doesn't that send shivers down your spine?

+Your bug report is too incomplete.  Can't help you.

+No.

+We'd rather jump off a cliff.

+Good luck with that.

+Looking forward to you providing code which solves the problem.

+This feature is probably older than you.

+it is behaving *exactly* as intended.

+There are a few compromises.

+I think I know a perfect candidate to take this further: You.

+Seriously?

+The OpenBSD process is quite well understood.  Use the best methods, doubt what you do, refractor.

+Hey, it looks like you are just trying to be a dick.

+Does your mother know?

+It's great that you have an opinion.

+Run something else! We don't care!

+That's a load of bull.

+Your opinions count for zero.

+To achieve merit, you must do the homework you assigned yourself.

+Get serious.

+and I wanna build a rocket ship...

+No thanks.

+The problem is obvious.

+If you don't have the skill to do it, well that's too bad...

+You didn't do your homework, and it blew up in your face.  Then you wrote a few paragraphs.  Then I replied.  That is the whole sad story.

+I tried to read the rest of what you wrote. It makes no sense.

--- a/lib/troll

+++ b/lib/troll

@@ -229,3 +229,15 @@

 [harvey-commits] [PATCH 2/2] Compile Harvey in C11 mode.

 [harvey] we need to bring sam back

 [harvey] booting a disk

+[Harvey] Harvey broken for me

+[harvey] Cannot boot with QEMU

+[harvey] we don't have a repeatable build process

+[harvey] Git clone not working

+[harvey] today's broken build

+[9fans] need a REAL WORKING iso

+[harvey] There is interest in harvey here at the riscv workshop

+[harvey] gerrit hell

+[harvey] Harvey fails to boot in qemu

+[golang-dev] godoc.org is down

+[harvey-commits] chdir regression test

+[harvey] FOSDEM

--- a/sys/games/lib/fortunes

+++ b/sys/games/lib/fortunes

@@ -5197,3 +5197,17 @@

 I did take a look at rewriting the CoC in Basic English and found it way too restrictive. -- Andrew Gerrand

 [#OpenBSD] Carefully explaining your problem is half the solution.

 If you get this, delete it. - Sorry! -- Tim Berners-Lee, www-talk, Mon, 28 Oct 91 14:34:12 GMT+0100

+Why are you wasting my life? -- Jeff Bezos

+All operating systems are bullshit. -- Ted Unangst

+If you want to get started with autotools, try to build yourself a minimal autotools project. Once you have a working stub, you already took the biggest hurdle. -- Hacker News comment

+Please, excuse me the outflow.

+uriel, what you say would make sense if the "jokes" didn't include putting mein kampf in /lib. -- erik quanstrom

+ISIS Influence on Web Prompts Second Thoughts on First Amendment

+Whenever possible, you should use the 'cat' command line tool for this. Here's an example in Go:

+GCC 6 Will Warn You About Misleading Code Indentations

+Subject: [FD] Apple WatchOS v2.1 - Denial of Service Vulnerability

+Any objections to me rewriting rc in go without all known bugs? -- brucee

+One way that I was able to get this working was forking 9front and adding a clunk callback to Srv structure.

+Your Go installation is broken. -- Brad Fitzpatrick

+./configure CFLAGS="-I$HOME/source/harvey/ape/amd64/include -I$HOME/source/harvey/ape/include -mno-red-zone -ffreestanding -fno-builtin -nostdlib -trigraphs -D_SUSV2_SOURCE -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_LIMITS_EXTENSION -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_BSD_EXTENSION -DHAVE_SOCK_OPTS -DHARVEY -DPlan9" LDFLAGS="-static $HOME/source/harvey/ape/amd64/lib/crt1.o $HOME/source/harvey/ape/amd64/lib/crti.o $HOME/source/harvey/ape/amd64/lib/crtn.o -L$HOME/source/harvey/ape/amd64/lib -L$HOME/source/harvey/amd64/lib" LIBS="-lbsd -lap -lc" LIBM="" --prefix=$HOME/source/harvey/ape/ports *--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --build=x86_64-harvey *--enable-shared=no

+Apache is less magical than it was in the 90's. -- Brad Fitzpatrick