ref: 7954fd897af0f78b514d09ed801cafafee4e8df5
dir: /README/
Compiling
=========
SCC is a portable toolchain that can be compiled on any UNIX system
out of the box. It supports four main configuration options that
can be passed to the command line:
- PREFIX: Prefix of the path where scc toolchain is going
to be installed. /usr/local by default.
- DESTDIR: Temporary directory prepend to PREFIX used in the
install path. It is mainly intended to help package maintainers
to install in a specific directory used as base for the package
generation.
- CROSS_COMPILE:
Specify a prefix name for the tools called by the Makefile.
- HOST:
Specify the host system to be used. Possible supported
values are:
- unix (by default)
- bsd
- plan9
- CONF: Specify which version of libc to build.
Once the build process completes only the target specified in
CONF will be built. Supported values are:
- amd64-linux (default)
- amd64-darwin
- amd64-openbsd
- arm64-linux
- amd64-dragonfly
- amd64-netbsd
- arm32-linux
- i386-linux
- TOOL: Specify the toolchain type to be used. Possible
supported values are:
- unix (by default)
- gnu
- gnu-darwin
- clang
The main targets of the Makefile are:
- all:
Compile the toolchain and the libc. It automatically
determines what is the best value for HOST. It sets the
value of CONF for the toolchain that is used by the
toolchain as the default target. It also compiles the libc
for all the available configurations based in the host
architecture.
- toolchain
Compile the toolchain with the default configuration
specified in CONF.
- libc:
Compile the libc for the target specified in CONF.
- install:
Installs scc in PREFIX.
- clean:
Remove all the generated files except the one supposed to be edited
by the user.
- distclean
Remove all the generated files.
Deviations from standard C
===========================
This compiler aims to be fully compatible with the C99 standard, but
it will have some differences:
- Type qualifiers are accepted but ignored.
-----------------------------------------
Type qualifiers make the type system more complex and they add
unnecessary complexity to the compiler (and increased compilation time):
- const: The definition of const is not clear in the standard.
If a const value is modified the behavior is undefined
behaviour. It seems it was defined in order to be able to
allocate variables in ROM rather than error detection. This
implememtation will not warn about these modifications and
the compiler will treat them like normal variables (the standard
specifies that a diagnostic message must be printed).
- volatile: This qualifier was added to the standard
to be able to deal with longjmp (local variables that are not
volatile have undefined state) and for memory mapped registers
or variables whose values are modified asynchronously. This can
be achieved by using special pragma values though.
In the first case, it generates a lot of problems with modern
processors and multithreading, when not holding the value in a
register is not good enough (an explicit memory barrier is needed).
In the second case, this is non-portable code by definition
(depending on the register mapped), so it is better to deal with
it using another solution (compiler extensions or direct
assembly). Since it is needed for the correct behaviour
of portable programs that use longjmp, this specifier eventually
will be implemented.
- restrict: This qualifier can only be applied to pointers that
mark the pointed object and has no other alias. This qualifier
was introduced to be able to fix some performance problems in
numerical algorithms, where FORTRAN could achieve a better
performance (and in fact even with this specifier FORTRAN has a
better performance in this field). Ignoring it doesn't make the
compiler non-standard and in almost all applications the performance
will be the same.
- Function type names
-------------------
C99 allows you to define type names of function types and write something
like:
int f(int (int));
Accepting function types in type names (or abstract declarators) makes the
grammar ambiguous because it is impossible to differentiate between:
(int (f)) -> function returning int with one parameter of type f
(int (f)) -> integer variable f
If you don't believe me try this code:
int
f(int g())
{
return g();
}
Function type names are stupid, because they are used as an alias
of the function pointer types, but it is stupid that something
like sizeof(int (int)) is not allowed (because here it should be
understood as the size of a function), but f(int (int)) is allowed
because it is understood as a parameter of function pointer type.
This complexity is not needed at all as function pointers fix all these
problems without this complexity (and they are the more common
way of writing such code).
- Definition of variables with incomplete type
---------------------------------------------
C89 allows the definition of variables with incomplete type that
have external linkage and file scope. The type of the variable is the
composition of all the definitions found in the file. The exact rules
are a bit complex (ANSI 3.7.2, or ISO C99 6.2.5p22) so SCC ignores them
at this moment by simply not allowing any definition of variables with
incomplete type.
If you don't believe me try this code:
struct foo x;
struct foo {
int i;
};
- Variadic function alike macros
------------------------------
The standard (C99 6.10.3 c 4) forces passing more parameters than
the number of parameters present in the variadic argument list
(excluding ...). SCC accepts a parameter list with the same number
of arguments.
#define P(a, ...) a
P(1)